Design Charette 1: Final Design

·         How will the proposed solution improve the emotional attachment of the user to the chair?
In terms of increasing emotional attachment to the user, this redesign uses both aesthetic appeal and increased comfort. By creating a chair more visually pleasing, the user experiences higher levels of attachment to the chair as it becomes a piece that adds character to their house and current furniture - it can also become a talking point between the user and friends.
The original design did not compensate very much for the physical comfort of the chair. Yet comfort also plays a big role in the emotional attachment of this chair. As the user sits in the chair it would become clear to them that it is good for their posture and enjoyable to sit in. This reinforces the users decision about purchasing this attachment and develops and emotional - physical relationship with the comfort level and posture correctiveness of the design.


·         What are the proposed materials?
The attachment would be made from a bent plywood to fit the visual style of the original pinewood chair.


·         How do you expect the consumer to use it?
The attachment fits directly into existing slots that are present in the original chair. The user simply takes out the existing backrest and places the new improved attachment in its place - increasing ergonomics and visual appeal.


·         What stimulus will encourage the user to modify the chair or buy the aftermarket attachments for the chair (eg, change in life circumstances, etc)
The original chair can be seen as a cheap and quick solution to seating needs. It could be assumed that the user is looking for a utility chair rather than a luxurious one. This could be because the user has a small budget and/or does not require such an expensive chair at this point. However, as the consumer ages and earns more money, they will most definitely look to replace this cheap chair. By incorporating an attachment that will benefit the consumer both ergonomically and visually, we hope that this attachment would be purchased instead of a whole new chair.

Design Charette 1: Concepts

Mind Maps

Psycho/Socio Attachments

This design focuses on the psycho/socio attachment of customisation. As the original chair comes in a standard flat pack variety - adding a simple way to let users customise the design will in turn add connectivity to the object. This will allow users to make their chairs unique to them.

This design, like the one above, also focuses on customisation but also personalisation. It incorporates a simple cloth backing to the chair somewhat reminiscent of hanging clothes on the back. These backings would come in all styles and brands, and would allow each chair in the house to be unique and belong to a certain family member. This could also bring about a sense of nostalgia if the chair was ever to be disposed of, and could add to its life cycle.

Physio Attachments

Extending the life of a product can be done by adding extra functionality that would be lost if the product was disposed of. By adding a simple storage system into the bottom of the chair, users could find other uses for the chair once it has passed its sitting life time.

A comfortable chair is much harder to rid of than an uncomfortable one. The original chair was very cheap and stiff, adding a cushion that could be customisable (and also play with the psycho/socio attachments) would make the chair much more comfortable and enjoyable to use.

Using the same idea as above, designing the backrest to be more comfortable and better for posture could ensure the product is much more enjoyable and physically comfortable to sit on.

Task 3: The 11th Hour

No longer are the words 'global warming' uncommon in todays world. The phenomenon is responsible for cataclysmic changes in our world including droughts, tougher hurricanes, floods and other natural disasters. The amount of carbon dioxide that is pumped into the atmosphere is incubating our planet, warming it up and causing it to fight back. Devastating amounts of human lives have been lost through events which can be linked back to this changing climate, yet it is still on the rise.

We live in a world that is culturally used to comforts such as cars, electricity on demand, fresh water and such. We seem to have grown so dependant on the accessibility of such resources without giving too much thought to their deliverance to us. Every time we drive our cars, we are personally responsible for increasing the carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere - however, given the other options, a car is the fastest and the most comfortable form of travel. This reasoning can be applied to almost everything and it is this reasoning that we must change if we are to reverse the damage already done to our planet.

As Industrial Designers, climate change should be at the forefront of every object we concieve. It should become as important, if not more so, as form and function. We are responsible for creating the products that people so desire because that is our job, and that is what creates an economy. This sort of thinking needs to be abolished if we are to succeed in fighting climate change. Products need to be designed with the environment in mind, whether it be with recyclable materials, expanding its life cycle or decreasing the effect its waste has on the planet. Industrial Designers pride themselves on being lateral problem solvers; creative. It is important now more than ever to show the world that we can help to solve the problem that is global warming.

Task 2: Objectified

The impact of design on our world undoubtedly goes unnoticed by the majority of its population. The end product is all a general consumer will ever see - and if the product is successful - rarely questioning the design steps to create it. This is what separates a consumer and an Industrial Designer.

As a young designer it is often a stumbling response that I can offer to the question "What do you do?". Explaining Industrial Design to somebody who is unaware of it is a difficult task and one that requires a comparison to engineering references. However, Industrial Design is not engineering, while yes it may be a part of it, ID is much more. It is encoding products with emotion, the enjoyment and the attachment that people feel towards a product and Objectified explains this extremely well.

In saying that, even I have learnt some things from this documentary. The first thing that really caught my attention was Dan Formosa's explanation of the target user. In my experience it has been the norm to assume an average user and try to address their problems and needs. However the idea of designing for the extremes, those with arthritis or elite athletes is an interesting one. Ultimately this rings true with almost all products - If we can design for those on the extreme scale, then the product will also fill the gaps of those in between. An example of this is an elite athlete. If we can design a runners shoe that best cushions the foot and lessens muscle injury, then isn't this product is going to be just as useful to anybody else who runs?

Or you could look at it from Apple's perspective and design for absolutely everybody. Coming from not only an Industrial Design background, but also as someone who works in a Mobile Phone retailer, I'm in a great position to see how consumers react to the iPhone from a sales point of view. I have sold these iphones to everybody from ages 18 to 68. They are iconic of this century and with Jonathan Ives' design philosophy it isn't hard to see why. Industrial Designers spend so much time on figuring out aesthetic and emotional detail that we sometimes forget the technical side. The fact that the macbook airs casing is fabricated from a single aluminium extrusion is amazing and a true testament to design.

I could go on but the point illustrated is that design is something we see everyday in our lives - it is all around us and affects us with every interaction, every frustration and every emotional attachment we have. A product can make us sad, it can make us happy or it can frighten us. It can do this by attaching to our particular needs - needs which can differ between every person. It may be that one product which is easily recyclable and helpful to the environment is not what a consumer wants. Take cars for example. Although we as humans have the technology and ability to produce 'green' cars, the fact they are not commonplace is indicative of the differentiation of peoples needs and wants and how these affect their decisions. However we can see this is becoming less evident as more and more people begin to purchase these 'green' cars.

As Industrial Designers, it is not only our responsibility to create products that help a user, but also to set trends, change views and help shape the world to be a better place.

Task 1: Ecological Footprint